Purina PFAS Class Action Lawsuit: Is It A Genuine Class Action? Read This
Did you receive the Purina PFAS Class Action Lawsuit email? It is not a scam. You received the mail because you filed a claim.
Who Is Behind The Purina PFAS Class Action Lawsuit
Fred Kueck and Jasen Silver bought Purina Cat Chow, thinking it’s a healthy choice for their pets. But they claim the packaging has these not-so-cool chemicals called PFAS. They say Purina gave off this vibe of being all safe and healthy, but PFAS is known for causing some health issues.
Basically, Kueck and Silver wouldn’t have gone for Purina Cat Chow if they knew the packaging had a bunch of PFAS. Now, they’re pointing fingers at Purina, saying they broke some California laws by not being upfront about it.
How Much Is The Settlement
There is no settlement amount for now
Fred Kueck and Jasen Silver are taking on Nestle Purina Petcare Company in a California federal court. Why, you ask? They claim Purina is doing some shady business by selling pet food that they say is all healthy and safe, but the packaging supposedly has this harmful stuff called PFAS.
Conclusion
Fred Kueck, et al. v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company, Case No. 4:23-cv-05962, is not a scam. Just like Ross Employees Class Action Lawsuit, Basically, Kueck and Silvewouldn’t have gone for Purina Cat Chow if they knew the packaging had a bunch of PFAS. Now, they’re pointing fingers at Purina, saying they broke some California laws.
